Here, Bogard uses scientific fact to prove that natural darkness is a key to nature and ecology. The response may deviate noticeably from a formal style and objective tone. Simply download our online casino, deposit and start playing! Paul Bogard, a respected and passionate writer, offers a convincing argument on the importance of allowing more darkness to fill the earth for distinct health and ecological reasons. Paul Bogard supports the preservation of natural darkness. We finally see the true importance of allowing our world to temporarily succumb to darkness. However, the writer is unable to express how Bogard uses these elements specifically. Analysis—2: The response offers some limited analysis of the source text, demonstrating partial understanding of the analytical task.
The response does not have a discernible progression of ideas. For example, at or near the end of each body paragraph, the writer restates the point that introduces that paragraph Bogard then gives a scientific case that shows why natural darkness is essential to humans. The response also lacks a recognizable introduction and conclusion, and sentences are strung together without a clear progression of ideas for much of the response, the writer merely lists claims Bogard makes. Bogard uses personal observation for credibility, stirring feelings, and startling facts to deliver a powerful argument. Writing—4: The writer demonstrates highly effective use and command of language in this cohesive response. Overall, this response demonstrates partially successful analysis.
Even though credibility makes many appearences throughout the passage, it would have no real meaning without evoking emotion. On the whole, this response offers some evidence of cohesion and control of language. Writing—3: This essay is mostly cohesive and demonstrates mostly effective control of language. Paul shows how many different characteristics affect how important darkness is to a human body. Light pollution is readily within our ability to solve, using new lighting technologies and shielding existing lights. Get started So what are you waiting for? This facts helps people persuade the audience. Bogard extends the facts to offer various solutions.
Bogard uses scientific evidence to support his belief in the preservation of natural darkness. Reading—2: This response demonstrates some understanding of the source text. Comparing how cities and towns across the world are changing thier ways of light is going to be wasted. Giving evidence of a historical artist Van Gogh adds a lot of emotion to this particular essay. One of the senses Bogard uses within his essay is touch.
His essay talks about so much facts about sleeping how so little can effect us health wise examples like getting sleep disorders, diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression. It shows that even a city that is literally famous for being constantly lit can practically address light pollution in a manner that preserves the beauty of both the city itself and the universe as a whole. For example, the writer offers a possible reason for why Bogard chose to open his argument with a personal anecdote, and is also able to describe the overall effect of that choice on his audience In telling this brief anecdote, Bogard challenges the audience to remember a time where they could fully amass themselves in natural darkness void of artificial light. Paul Bogard builds a very persuasive argument to persuade his audience that natural darkness should be preserved. For example, he also claims is used two sentences in a row in this brief response. If this sounds intimidating, keep in mind that many colleges consider your best. Bogard builds his arguement in a few different ways.
The response demonstrates general and vague word choice; word choice may be poor or inaccurate. Writing—1: This response demonstrates little cohesion and inadequate skill in the use and control of language. It features three main sections: math, reading and writing which includes an optional written essay. The different features also help him in appealing to a broader audience. Writing—2: This response demonstrates limited cohesion and some skill in the use of language. The response demonstrates some precise word choice. Humans need darkness to sleep in order to be healthy.
The response may lack a formal style and objective tone. He notes that there are a variety of nocturnal and crepuscular species of birds, fish, mammals, insects, and reptiles worldwide. The writer again mentions persuasion before the conclusion of the essay With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us , but once again, there is no explanation of how or why these features are persuasive. He was all of facts and examples that he claim is efficting us and there world. Bogard begins his argument by first providing a story from his personal experience, appealing to the reader by adding imagery.
The writer also demonstrates a clear progression of ideas both within paragraphs and throughout the essay. In the article he talks about how darkens actually helps the body produce a hormone that keeps certain cancers from developing. If the two readers scores differ by more than one point, a third reader scores the essay. With these features he can persuade the auidence because people dont know why darkness can be good for us. Who knows what this vision of the night sky might inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren? To supplant this, Bogard gives a personal example of how he enjoyed seeing meteors dart across the night sky in Minnesota as a child. Even the northern lake where I was lucky to spend my summers has seen its darkness diminish. There is a consistent use of both precise word choice and well-chosen turns of phrase the natural magnificence of stars in a dark sky is definite, our world consumed by unnatural, vapid lighting, the affecting power of an untainted night sky.
All life evolved to the steady rhythm of bright days and dark nights. Many medical centers have concluded that are bodies need darkness to produce many different hormones and to continue with processes to keep us alive. In your essay, analyze how Bogard uses one or more of the features in the directions that precede the passage or features of your own choice to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Although the writing in this response is proficient, it does not demonstrate the sentence variety, precise word choice, or highly effective progression of ideas that is expected at the advanced level. Writing as a reaction to his disappointment that artificial light has largely permeated the prescence of natural darkness, Paul Bogard argues that we must preserve true, unaffected darkness.