They also frequently include monthly stipends to help cover the cost of various other living expenses. It is giving the athletes what they deserve. For example, how many University of Michigan basketball fans would have bought jerseys with number four on the back if Chris Webber did not wear it first? Cons: Why Paying College Athletes Might Be a Bad Idea The idea of college athletes being paid certainly seems reasonable when you consider all the factors above. And maybe we also need to address relevant issues outside of the college sports system. Traditionalists also argue that college sports are designed to foster true sportsmanship and not so the athletes could profit from them. They also aren't allowed to make money from their limited celebrity status such as by selling autographed jerseys, endorsing products, or doing local commercials. But even if athletes are capable of handling college-level classes, they may not have the time necessary for doing well in them.
But coaches usually get to decide who gets full-ride scholarships, and for how long. Plus, sports and academics often seem to have cross purposes. But it will probably take a small change to federal antitrust law to make something like a universal limit on coach pay possible. College athletes would be often drawn into corruption by agents and boosters who are willing to bribe them to play for other schools. They might also not have the capacity to give big paychecks and therefore lose out on talented students, who understandably want to receive the higher pay that larger schools can give. Should college athletes get paid? That's why a lot of students choose to attend schools that have a stronger focus on providing training and education for good careers.
Therefore, the issue becomes should only football and basketball college athletes be paid? Your future has never looked so near and yet so daunting. Should College Athletes Be Paid? I still sympathize with college athletes because I use to play college football and I can tell you it's not an easy task to play sports and attend school full time. Before my academic apostasy, I was working towards a doctorate in philosophy at the University of Oxford. Practical acknowledgement of the long odds of making it to the pros People who believe that college athletes should not be paid often point out that professional athletes in the major sports can make millions of dollars. College sports can be better than pro sports because almost all of the athletes play for the love of the game.
Paying student athletes creates a number of variables which offer plenty of pros and cons to think about. Paying college athletes would also lead to the erosion of the connection between athlete students and college values. Remember: student players risk their lives to play these sports. It provides another incentive to play. Paying college athletes is difficult for a number of reasons. This is a problem within the college sports community that is likely to be eliminated if college athletes were paid. Six months later, Ware was healed and back to practicing.
They seldom take real classes. Also, there is an issue on equal pay among players in different divisions. Aside from that, larger divisions could monopolize athletic talent, taking away the chance for smaller schools to win major titles. By paying student athletes, schools are treating them like pros, encouraging them to continue the kind of dedication and perseverance when they become professionals. First you answer a series of questions about your situation and your goals. Do they ever receive much of a break? Besides, college athletes are being paid in a different way. In the form of scholarships.
In reality, much of that money is already used by the conferences and schools to host games or conduct events already. Scholarships can cover a portion, if not all, of these costs. Overall, they are injured at a rate of six injuries per 1,000 competitions or practices. Body Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid Paragraph 1: Since college athletics programs are geared towards turning a profit at the end in terms of the revenue generated during the programs, it would only be fair to pay the athletes involved. By definition, paying the athlete would make them a professional. Every career requires knowledge and skill, but a college degree these days guarantees neither. Then the program narrows down thousands of advisors to three fiduciaries who meet your needs.
After all, other students aren't restricted from making money from their talents while enrolled in school. But although some people are able to quickly answer the question with a simple yes or no, many of us find it difficult to formulate an opinion. They provide highly popular entertainment and amazing promotional value, but their compensation is often out of proportion with that value. In addition, something should probably be done to curb the excessive spending on coaches' salaries. After all, they would owe taxes on those earnings. I'm an active high school student involved with extracurricular activities such as soccer, basketball, and track. Other sports pale in comparison and almost always lose money.
The Cons of Paying College Athletes 1. They are full of impact that can result to injuries, where many players, especially those who are playing for the major leagues, have been seriously hurt at any point during games and even practices. The main reason for this involves their exposure and play time in college. The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer. This article is your guide to the most common arguments on each side of the debate over paying college athletes.
Not to mention, some athletes receive athletic gear supporting their team along with properly regulated meals. They get to attend school at a greatly reduced cost thanks to the money generated by students who pay tuition and fees, the generosity of alumni, and, in a lot of cases, the taxes paid by the public. How do you determine which athletes get the most money? Paying college students, a little extra, would actually go a long way, especially for the ones belonging to a family with low income. The Players Are The One Putting It All On The Line Sports are not a no risk situation. Some players, if they come from a low-income household, get a few hundred dollars each semester from Pell Grants which enables them to buy chicken soup instead of chicken-flavored ramen. The amount of money that is actually brought in is not as astounding as many think, and some sports bring in more than others.
Student-athletes are the ones working hard out on the court and field. College athletic departments may not be able to handle the extra financial burden. While other students are working part time, college athletes are working hard in court, in the field or in the rink, without earning even a single dollar. This would possibly increase graduation rates, allow fans to see their favorite players mature through college, and ensure coaches are preparing athletes as much as possible for the next level. Top players will go on to play professional sports in the future. College sports is a rapidly growing industry in the United States.