He takes issue with other scholars who downplay or dismiss the idological commitments of Civil War soldiers, and argues persuasively that courage, honor, love of liberty and country had powerful meanings in North and South. The South thought of itself as distinct from the rest of the nation. Each chapter addresses another question. Naturally, many southern young men felt the immediacy of invasion; they signed on in many cases to protect their homes. I highly recommend for those with an interest in the history and details of the Civil War.
Wright Mills, White Collar New York: Oxford University Press, 1951 ; Peter M. Write short sentence fragments or keywords of all of the facts that you can remember. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Jensen Branscombe Texas Christian University For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. Motivated by duty and honor, and often by religious faith, these men wrote frequently of their firm belief in the cause for which they fought: the principles of liberty,freedom, justice, and patriotism. Ideology made a difference for some southern civilians as well.
In the beginning, this was a divisive issue; many Northern soldiers were angry, and felt they had been sent on a fool's errand. Four key questions are asked, what… 774 Words 4 Pages For Cause and Comrades is a book written by James McPherson, with the help of diaries and letters written by soldiers from the Confederate and Union forces, he is able to formally detail accounts on why men fought in the civil war. Why did the conventional wisdom -- that soldiers become increasingly cynical and disillusioned as war progresses -- not hold true in the Civil War? McPherson uses the words of troops themselves, based on their writings letters, memoirs, journals or diaries. Commanders despaired when an appreciable number of soldiers woke up one day and said their time was up, regardless of circumstances. White northerners adopted those features of southern culture they liked.
At the beginning of the war, men volunteered to prove their manhood, they were anxious for a fight. Reflecting the fruitful conjunction of an important topic and the talentsof a major historian, this book merits the widest possible readership. Great summation of the war The american civil war was a constant barrage of battles fought by Americans on both sides. More recent scholars have made the same point. Why did the conventional wisdom -- that soldiers become increasingly cynical and disillusioned as warprogresses -- not hold true in the Civil War? Anyone with even a superficial knowledge of Civil War battles can see that Civil War soldiers did not think like modern soldiers. If Confederates had so rich a goal as to fight for their homeland, what kept Northern soldiers marching till their feet bled, sleeping in the rain with no shelter, wading through mud, often returning after one or more injuries with which they could have manfully chosen to be discharged? Three future presidents fought in the Civil War: Ulysses S.
Many soldiers who wrote to their families during the war insisted on performing their national duty which is to defend their country from traitors. McPherson In this book, noted Civil War historian James McPherson provides a work that demonstrates the potential of statistical analysis in history and the combination of social and military history when handled skillfully by someone with a full respect for the texts and the people who wrote them. Unsurprisingly, this question continues to be discussed today. This was despite the fact that there was no state coercion, discipline was lax, and no role for ethnic and religious hatred, and subordination was unheard of. The most accomplished Civil War historian of today has produced a richly-rsearched, elegantly-written volume that shatters once and for all the illusion that Civil War soldiers lacked an understanding of the monumental idological issues of their day. The author points out that the American Civil War is different than many others in that so many people were literate over 80% on both sides and there was no censorship on their letters. The main purpose of the Root Cause Analysis is to understand how the event happened, why did it happen, and what can be done to prevent an event from happening again.
In battle, men fought for various reasons, one of which was honor and being seen as courageous. Why did they enlist in the first place? Some chose to stay; others went home for a visit for a couple of weeks, and then signed up again. Duty, honor, and belief in the cause were the most common reasons that Civil War soldiers gave for enlisting in the army. Perhaps readers will take another look at the expressions by soldiers quoted two paragraphs above when they learn that all four of them were subsequently killed in action. In 1867, Ku Klux Klan held the first documented national meeting in Tennessee. Wickham, commander of the famous 101st Airborne Division in the 1970s and subsequently Army Chief of Staff, once visited Antietam battlefield. Andthey fought to defend their honor and manhood.
Assignment Document Analysis Essay: Civil War Introduction This is a document analysis essay and the topic of focus is American Civil War. It paints a vivid portrayal of how these men thought and acted. Public memories of Confederate rebels helped crystallize southerners' reaction to desegregation and equal rights. Looking at all of these factors, McPherson concludes by estimating their cumulative impact on the soldiers. Born in 1801, Debby Clark told interviewers after the war that her grandfather fought in the Revolutionary War and her brother served with Andrew Jackson in the War of 1812.
McPherson''s For Cause and Comrades. They were loyal to their region. Despite military setbacks, despite hardships, despite conflicting loyalties of family and duty, among those carrying the fight on either side, victory was the only option. For example, in the 8-D and corrective action models it's implied that root cause analysis is simply one step. From this distance, it seems impossible to comprehend why Americans were so committed to killing one another. The result of his research, For Cause and Comrades, explains what soldiers fought for and how they coped with the fear and stress of battle. Soldiers on both sides harkened back to the Founding Fathers, and the ideals of the American Revolution.
Wars are waged by the rich and powerful, but fought by the poor masses who march, inexorably into the meat grinder. Its a shame that our idealism and patriotism has gone by the wayside. The mostaccomplished Civil War historian of today has produced a richly-rsearched,elegantly-written volume that shatters once and for all the illusion that CivilWar soldiers lacked an understanding of the monumental idological issues oftheir day. Over the course of time, their viewpoint changes markedly as Union soldiers made their way further south. Examining Victorian America and its influence on soldiers' sense of duty, he considers factors of religion, liberty, and preservation of the Union and the deciding pull of self-preservation. The book fills readers with a profound respect for the soldiers who struggled so valiantly for the cause in which they believed. The book examines the motivation of rank-and-file soldiers to continue fighting in the face of great danger and incredible hardship.