. You are unlikely to be asked to review for such a journal early in your publishing career, unless you have managed to publish in one yourself. The main two elements of article review are a theoretical and objective discussion. Still, your job is to understand the logic, structure, and essence of the material in the article. This may include new theories, interpretations, evaluations, or applications.
If one who is new to reading articles, writing answers to these questions and taking notes will help in understanding most aspects of a research article. You will always discuss the main issues of the article, but you can sometimes also focus on certain aspects. Dothey make sense on their own or only if one has read the textcarefully? Your thesis should address the above issues. I am more willing to review for journals that I read or publish in. Is there an angle the authors have overlooked? Specific inclusion criteria have been delineated in order to distinguish papers with the highest scientific merit 2. She is also a contributing writer for Suite101 and has articles published on eHow and Answerbag. If the reviewer has ideas on how to improve the paper and the research, sharing those suggestions in the most precise manner possible will raise the likelihood that the authors will understand, appreciate, and utilize those ideas.
Then I follow a routine that will help me evaluate this. Specifically: Do they integrate their findings with the research literature they presented earlier in their article--do they bring the findings back to the previous literature reviewed? Methodology If the manuscript you are reviewing is reporting an experiment, check the methods section first. Many students simply include article summary using the language they want, but this piece must follow official English language. If I think favorably of the article and believe it should be published, I often will write a longer summary, and highlight the strengths of the article. Don't: highlight every paragraph — just the central points.
Jot down this observation in your outline and look up the facts of the study to confirm your observation. Do: supplement the most important points with notes or cross-references. This will help you spot grammar mistakes and see any flaws in the organization. If certain aspects relate to your argument specifically, then make sure to include them. This article was co-authored by.
The questions that can be asked under various sub-headings of an original research paper are presented as a simple questionnaire in. A few studies have evaluated the quality of review articles. Do not be afraid to reject a bad paper; i. When writing a review of an article published in a professional journal or anthology, focus on a topic or issue that draws your attention. Please ensure that comments are detailed and clear and that they are constructive in nature, even if you are recommending that the paper be rejected.
Here is some good news for the students around the world. There are several possible reasons. However in a systematic review, a very detailed, and comprehensive literature surveying is performed on the selected topic. Skim the article to get a feel for its organization, read it multiple times, and jot down notes and comments during the process. Begin to map your outline accordingly.
Do: capture the main points of each section, as space allows. Indeed, a well-performed large scale study, and a weakly designed one are weighed on the same scale. Since there is an abundance of journals and articles, it is critical to develop a modus operandi for achieving a rapid, purposeful, effective and useful method to read these manuscripts. For information on ethics and responsibility and how to act if you suspect that misconduct has taken place, please see the section of this Gateway and remember to keep your suspicions confidential, between you and the journal editor, at all times. Besides, highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed to the field.
Is the style stilted or unnecessarily complicated? Then I run through the specific points I raised in my summary in more detail, in the order they appeared in the paper, providing page and paragraph numbers for most. Summarize the information and essence of what you feel is important. Still, there are more items you need to include in an article review. Include important points and make sure your information is accurate. Since peer review is confidential, you also must not share information about the review with anyone without permission from the editors and authors. Are the findings clearly stated? A reader must make a decision whether the specific text is worth of his attention.
Instead, it would need to change the way we think about some aspect of your field. Science Scientific article review involves anything in the realm of science. Try to substantiate an argument offered by the writer. I look for specific indicators of research quality, asking myself questions such as: Are the background literature and study rationale clearly articulated? I almost never print out papers for review; I prefer to work with the electronic version. Waiting another day always seems to improve the review. Does the information seem well-researched or is it unsupported? After reading it in full, scrutinize the article section by section.