An adult will typically spend their sentence thinking about what they did, which typically leads to remorse. Judges in adult courts have much fewer options, and usually choose the prison one. Studies have proven that there has been? Is prison effective as a punishment or a deterrent for juveniles? Teens also do not have a fully developed cerebellum, the area of the brain that helps control impulse. The perception in some justice systems is that trying children in adult courts would have an adverse effect on the children as they could likely have some sort of psychological problems. It gives justice to the victims and their loved ones. They do this without any thought towards the child? In order to better understand the passion behind this debate it is best to gain some insight from both sides of the fight. Because one that it is wrong to hold kids to adult standards.
They have a powerful ally: Jeb Bush. Yet some activists would put an end to that practice in every instance, no matter the crime and no matter the criminal. If they had the guts to break the law they should have the responsibility to face what they did. Usually the kids that get away with a crime with community service, probation, etc. A 10 year old boy who shows no remorse for his crime would still be given an extremely lax sentence because of his age. If the courts are punishing juvenile offenders for committing serious crimes in a relaxed manner, then they are simply treating adult offenders in a biased and unfair manner and the law of punishment should match the crime will be breached.
This happens even though courts have said that juveniles are different from adults and in some situations must be treated differently. Kids probably didn't know what they were doing at the time or thinking about it, or they didn't have anyone to teach them any better. It is absurd to argue that a modern child, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, doesn't understand what killing really is. For a juvenile case to be transferred to an adult criminal court, it has to be eligible for a waiver. Many of them are aware of just how flawed the juvenile justice system is, and use that to their advantage. Reverse waiver applies in few cases, such as murder or rape. So before you give your verdict on this issue, weigh the evidence first.
A child in a juvenile facility stands a much better changes of having an experience that will change his or her future for the better. I would because a person's a person no matter their age, gender, or crime. This age is subject to state laws whereby different countries or states have this age set between 17 to 18 years on general terms. He was only 14 years old. Parents need their rest and relaxation. One way to do this would be for communities to step in.
A child may steal due to hunger, bad parenting, wrong peers but there's something seriously wrong with a rapist. Despite this, they are not. Many of these crimes listed carry a minimum of three hundred and sixty six days in a state prison. Holding a 12 year old to the same standard as a 30 year old when they don't have the same mental development is wrong. Below, a few of the arguments posited by both sides of the juvenile crime debate. More rules and laws regarding juvenile sex offenders need to be set down so that all sex offenders are tried in the same way; young or not, they are still committing a horrible crime. .
Trying kids as adults is also a bad idea because it often leads to juveniles committing more crimes upon their release. It is believed that the juvenile courts are established keeping age factor in mind rather than focusing on the crime factor. Hence, the emergence and increasing significance of the dilemma of whether juvenile offenders be tried and punish as adults. When he is released at age 25, what are the odds that he would become a full-fledge adult criminal? Juveniles should be able to make a mistake and be tried as a juvenile not an adult. At what age should one be held accountable for their actions? Despite these numbers, it is still a sad reality that there are still too many adolescents who are committing crimes, including violent ones such as murder, rape, and assault. The only way to change the behavior of young prisoners is to provide them with the opportunity to gain insight into why they think and behave the way they do. Compared with subjecting juvenile offender in trial and eventually punishing them under the adult court, there are evident differences wherein the young offenders are considered to be capable, accountable and inclined not to change.
A young person released from juvenile prison is far less likely to commit a crime than someone coming out of an adult facility. When adults do crimes they already know almost everything that is right and wrong because of their childhood mistakes. It gives parents a message that they can take less responsibility. Psychologically speaking, it is said that there are no 'problem children', only 'problem parents'. With the number of children in adult prisons and jails rising rapidly, questions are being asked as to why children have been committing such heinous crimes and how will they be stopped. Kids held in adult prisons don? Under the structure of the juvenile court, young offenders are treated under the presumptions of their unfinished hence imperfect maturity, decision-making which is below the maturity level and a still evolving personality.
It does not mean that because it was a child who committed the crime, the family of the victim does not continue to suffer. Then again, everyone is equal right? By sending adolescents to jail, parents can be let off the hook. Many states passed laws making it easier to try certain youthful offenders as adults; some states considered the radical proposal of abolishing juvenile courts. One of the most controversial being whether to try juveniles as adults or not. Juveniles should definitely not be tried as adults and spend… Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? Just last week, a 12-year-old boy in was charged with two counts of first-degree murder for killing his mother and stepfather. Message of Lost Hope By giving juveniles extremely hard sentences, it gives the impression that there is no hope for their future and no hope of them ever becoming anything but a criminal and a convict.