Zoos are basically the same things as prisons. Why should zoos not be banned? Breeding programmes provide zoos with good publicity, but in fact most of them are failures. There is no denying that our world has evolved drastically since past few centuries. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts. I fail to see how keeping animal in captivity is going to directly affect the population of the wild animals. Animals should be free, since it's a free country.
Some people completely object to the idea of smoking and think that it should be banned. Screenings, quarantine procedures, parasite removal, and other common treatments are part of the standard care process now as well. In that regard, the Cincinnati Zoo is by all means a good zoo, providing Harambe a relatively comfortable enclosure. The Giant Panda is an example of how difficult breeding programs in captivity can be. There are two problems with the claim that zoos are beneficial because they help to conserve endangered species. As ludicrous as this sounds, it is apparently a hot topic of debate, and a belief that many share. Also, the only way really to understand other species is to study them in their natural habitat and see how they interact socially and with other species of flora and fauna.
Every animal in the zoo isn't going extinct. Holding any animal in captivity has questionable ethics. Despite zoos having us believe otherwise, the animals kept in zoos are usually taken from the wild. Captive breeding programs are implemented to help preserve animals that have decreased in number, which is a good way to prevent extinction of some species. We cannot really say that they would be best left in the wild. It's time we moved on. The offspring are forever part of the chain of zoos, circuses, petting zoos, and exotic pet trade that buy, sell and barter animals among themselves and exploit animals.
But last night colleagues slapped her down, saying her views were personal and not those of the Government. Some people may question why Salinger has Holden Caulfiend cursing so much. Also, some of them have a more difficult time surviving in the wild by themselves due to pollution, destruction of their habitats, high level of competition for food, over-predation, diseases and other unfortunate reasons. Ever since there has been an increasing public concern about animal welfare in zoos. And no one could predict how a drugged animal that weighs 450 pounds would react. So why would you want animals extinct.
It is a well-known fact that zoos are very confining especially for wild animals. Other zoos do not have that luxury. Teaching for working from home. Animal testing surrounds you in every act of life. In this case, zoos act like temples of sanctuary, where human intervention inside protects a species from human threats outside.
Another reason is that zoos help endangered animals from extinction. It is a unique breed in the equine world because it has 66 chromosomes instead of 64. Eventually, the production and consumption of smoking create businesses and jobs for people, and high cigarettes taxes finance early child education and public safety; however cigarette smoking should not be available because they are killing people. Edinburgh was the first British zoo to follow the idea of displaying animals without bars. As a study, a cigarette contains seven thousand chemicals, but about two hundred of them are substances and toxics which cause health detriments. Let us take a look at their biggest pros and cons: List of the Biggest Pros of Zoos 1. It needs to end because animals are living things that can feel pain and sufferings just like how we humans do.
Zoos can exist without cruelty to animals, however, and so the fact that there are animal welfare problems with some zoos does not meant that all zoos should be shut down. Unfortunately, this goal tends to be more of a marketing technique than an actual mission statement. People perceive zoos as part of their schema: a zoo is a place that would always be readily available to them and the idea of banning zoos still seem to be a far-off idea. Zoos are not like the exotic animal menageries from the middle ages. Water tanks that they keep the marine animals in are not at all the same as open waters. As above we should take a 'both-and' approach rather than an 'either-or' approach. All this knowledge and information is shared with visitors, organizations, and other programs alike.
There are so many reasons in this case why the positives of having zoos out way the negatives. In turn, they will be more likely to buy animal friendly produce and be more likely to campaign for these animals. Depriving animals of their natural habitat, just to entertain people is unethical. From the Pampers you put on as a baby and the Johnson and Johnson you are washed with. Zoos often treat animals with respect and give them all that they need to survive and live a long happy life.
At least the animals have a place to stay. To when you are older, the Febreeze, Sunsilk, and Gillette you use Companies That do Test on Animals. Because animals are nature they belong here, and if we close down zoos we wont be able to see any of the animals. Smoking speeds up the process of aging and each cigarette smoked costs smokers six minutes of their life HubPages. Activities are arranged for the animals to help keep them mentally alert.